On my i7 950 with 6Gb/s SSD and 12GB of memory most of the bottlenecks are still from the drive access. (In particular there is still a massive difference if I pull one report and then refresh it.) Imports are a bit more complicated because in order to make them write speed bound you have to import...

Deinstalled PT4, HEM1 and Postgres 8.4.12, installed Postgres 9.0 and PT4 new, no improvement

New Logfile uploaded:

https://www.pokertracker.com/contact/ti ... _id=124402

Ah, sry, my fault. New log is uploaded:

https://www.pokertracker.com/contact/ti ... _id=124402

No more suggestions? Cause it is still slow even though I upgraded to Postgres 8.4.12

You're right, how could I miss that?

So, you're telling me a Core i7 2670QM is not enoug for a 110K Hand DB?

PostgreSQL caches data itself so that subsequent runs will be faster than the first run when you're running the same report. That would explain the behavior you're seeing. Uhm, i think PT4 isn't caching anything on my machine since subsequent runs take the same amount of time than the first run. Ma...

I'm pretty sure 33,812% is right:



I'm thinking u added an extra 50 Chips to Heros stack for the BB which u don't have to do since hero posted the BB.

I think I may have found another bug. At least there is a discrepancy between the EV-calculations I did and PT4s calculations: Hand #1 ID: T5-258566877-12 OnGame - $11.00+$0.00|25/50 NL (5 max) - Holdem - 5 players Hand converted by PokerTracker 4: http://www.pokertracker.com BTN: 1,035.00 S...

I think u'll find this info very helpful: Every tournament i finish 3rd (aka as bubbleboy) PT4 gives my stack at the beginning of the tournament an ICM-Equity of 12% where it should be 20%. I bust as 4th or 5th i have 20% ICM Equity at the beginning and if I make it ITM I also have 20% ICM Equity to...