Does PT3 still require multiple DBs for large amts of hands?

[madskills]

Original PT3 user, switched to HEM bc I didnt like having to have multiple DBs. Is this still the way ppl are dealing with v large DB sizes for PT3 or has there been a "fix"

Thanks.

[the other mike]

Hi -

To be honest I'm not sure if you're talking about being an original Pokertracker2 user or Pokertracker3 user. PokerTracker3 was designed from the start to handle millions of hands in a single database. Or to create multiple databases with millions of hands in each. I don't know if Holdem Manager can have more than one database but I like just having the choice.

Some may want to keep all their own hands and datamined hands in a single database but some like me prefer multiple databases (it avoids clutter, no purging or wasting disc space on obsolete data - I throw them away and start news ones when I need to). Either way is fine with PokerTracker3.

If you initially meant you were a PokerTracker2 user you might want to try the PokerTracker3 trial and test it for yourself: Pokertracker3 downloads (you can download either "build 5.1" on that page).

Mike

[APerfect10]

Original PT3 user, switched to HEM bc I didnt like having to have multiple DBs. Is this still the way ppl are dealing with v large DB sizes for PT3 or has there been a "fix"

Thanks.

If you used PT3 when it first came out then it is MUCH more efficient now and you should not have any issues having a larger, single database. Make sure that you download the latest version which is 3.00 Build 5.1

Best regards,

Derek