I read thomas42's post with great interest. I must agree with him that all the emphasis on PT3 seems to be on cash games. Why is this so?
I don't have nearly as many requests as Thomas does, but I feel his pain. Why not at least start with some very simple ones and gradually increase them as time goes by. At least that would give us SNG players a sense of progress.
An example might be at least to implement the auto rate system for tournament games. If that programming is available for cash games, I would think it could be easily implemented for SNG. I have only waited 2 years for this but never got even a decent explanation why it is withheld. The only explanation I ever got was along the lines that you never see the same player twice, so what is the use. This tells me the programmers don't play SNGs but only cash games. SNG games you meet the same players over and over and accumulate tens of thousands of hands on them. Not talking big tourneys here, just the simple single table 9 seat SNG which happens to be the fastest growing online game.
When I explained this more than a year ago, the forum moderator reluctantly agreed with me and suggested I would at least see this in a matter of time.
I agree with Thomas42 that even without enhancements on the tournament side the program is well worth the money. But I also suspect you are missing a big market by not paying more attention to needs on the tournament side. Wish others like Thomas and I would speak up and be heard.
Thanks for any attention you can give.