by WhiteRider » Mon Dec 19, 2011 6:31 am
This appears to be a seat numbering issue.
6-max tables do not use seat numbers 1 to 6, they use 1,2,3 and 8,9,10.
Similarly their 9-max tables use seat numbers 1 to 10 and miss out 6 - at least, it's 6 in this example so we'll need to check if these numbers are consistent.
Thanks for bringing this to our attention - I'll make the development team aware of this.