kraada wrote:I see that there is a typo in the Float definition and I'll make sure that gets fixed. For Float Turn it should read:
Percentage of the time that a player bets in position on the turn after the aggressor fails to continuation bet on the turn.
Sorry, I might be completely mistaken but I think what you are describing is a float flop.
There might be a difference there between float (call one street to bet another) and a bet vs. missed cbet (which you seem to be describing).
kraada wrote:The reason we must use this definition is that we cannot tell when you call the flop continuation bet if you are planning on attempting to take it away on the turn if he shows weakness. We simply can't tell what your intentions are - especially since sometimes you will call to plan to float then not get a chance to do so.
True. That's why if the PFA cbets turn that hand shouldn't count to the float stat (not even to the opportunity); however, if the player calls the flop in position then bets the turn if the PFA checks, I do believe the flop has been floated - not the turn.
My guess is that misunderstanding could be solved (especially avoiding mistakes and doubt from less experienced players) by changing the term "float" for just "bet vs. missed cbet".
I didn't mess with this enough on PT4 but it could be important to have that stat both IP and OOP (taking into account the OOP bet vs. missed cbet will occur in the following street, i.e., bet turn vs. missed flop cbet).
I do think from the top of my head now that this makes the whole "floating" thing covered in terms of stats, with a simpler language. I might be wrong though, and sorry for writing quickly and not having more time for reflecting on it. You and the other players can just correct me if I'm wrong.
(edited because I had messed up the quotes)