All-in adjusted results in PLO - what the hell

[dsaq]

Hello guys. I have this pretty standard hand I played on Pokerstars at PLO micros, 6-max Zoom. Using PT4 4.14.26.

I have $5.09 in the SB. MP opens for 0.17$, CU calls. I squeeze with AhAd7h5c for 0.73$.
BB behind me calls, MP calls, CU calls.

We're 4-way to the flop, which reads AcKc6s. The pot is 2.92$. I cbet for 2.81$.
BB, who was short, goes all-in with his 0.75$ left. MP, who's deep and has me covered, calls for 2.81$. CU folds.

Turn brings 5d (board reads: AcKc6s5d; the pot is $9.29), I shove for 1.55$ left, MP calls.

Now, according to Pokertracker's playback (which is confirmed by Odds oracle), I have 44% equity with my top set. MP with his QsJcTc9d has 39%. BB (short) with his 7c6c4s2s has 17%.
Against MP alone (short stack excluded) I have 62.5% equity

River brings 3c. I lose against MP's flush draw.

I was a favorite (44% against both; 62.5% against big stack) on the turn and shoved for 1.55$ in order to win 12.39$ if called. I needed 12.5% equity plus rake. Meanwhile, the summary in the "Results" section shows me that I lost 5.09$ ("Won" column) and that, likewise, I was losing $5.09 with that play ("All-In Adj" column). The "All-In Adj BB" column says that I was losing 101.80 BB with my play.
Oh, and the "All-in Equity" column doesn't show any figure (while it shows figures for several other hands where I got it in during the session). I attach the screenshot for some hands with me being all-in. This problematic hand is at the top.

I guess I quite don't understand it. A bug?


P.S. Here are the hand's details:

PokerStars - $0.05 PL Hi FAST (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: $11.14 (VPIP: 26.47, PFR: 21.18, 3Bet Preflop: 19.67, Hands: 171)
Hero (SB): $5.09
BB: $1.48 (VPIP: 55.56, PFR: 40.74, 3Bet Preflop: 40.00, Hands: 27)
UTG: $5.00 (VPIP: 23.97, PFR: 14.05, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 122)
MP: $29.31 (VPIP: 28.07, PFR: 26.32, 3Bet Preflop: 16.67, Hands: 59)
CO: $11.31 (VPIP: 31.58, PFR: 15.79, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 19)

Hero posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.07) Hero has A A 5 7

fold, MP raises to $0.17, CO calls $0.17, fold, Hero raises to $0.73, BB calls $0.68, MP calls $0.56, CO calls $0.56

Flop: ($2.92, 4 players) 6 K A
Hero bets $2.81, BB calls $0.75 and is all-in, MP calls $2.81, fold

Turn: ($9.29, 3 players) 5
Hero bets $1.55 and is all-in, MP calls $1.55

River: ($12.39, 3 players) 3

Hero shows A A 5 7 (Three of a Kind, Aces)

MP shows Q 9 J T (Flush, Ace High)

BB shows 7 4 6 2 (Flush, Ace High)

MP wins $11.91
Rake paid $0.48

[Flag_Hippo]

Any hands where players have the opportunity to act after another street is dealt following an all-in are excluded from the all-in adjusted calculations because the players who can act have further choices, and only the stronger hands are likely to get to showdown (with weaker hands folding). If we calculate net adjusted results only when no-one folds, that will mean that this will be for hands where the players generally had stronger hands, and this would introduce an overall bias in the results. In cases like this the net adjusted result will match the actual result (so that the net adjusted graph follows your actual results and only diverges when all-in equity is calculated).

[dsaq]

Thank you.