RFI vs PFR. Which one is better to construct ranges?

Questions and discussion about PokerTracker 4 for Windows

Moderators: WhiteRider, kraada, Flag_Hippo, morny

RFI vs PFR. Which one is better to construct ranges?

Postby abstractdude » Tue Sep 08, 2020 1:39 pm

In my All Player report usually the RFI number is higher than PFR. For instance in BTN the PFR number is 23.28 but the RFI is 37. Same with CO with a PFR% of 19.80 and RFI of 25.13 (and so on with similar gaps for every position).

Which one of these stats is more helpful to infer ranges from?
abstractdude
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2020 3:52 pm

Re: RFI vs PFR. Which one is better to construct ranges?

Postby Flag_Hippo » Wed Sep 09, 2020 5:52 am

You can infer a players RFI range directly from that stat but you cannot infer a players RFI range (or other ranges) from PFR since it includes isolation raises, limp raises, 3bets, 4bets+. So if for example you wanted to estimate a players 3Bet range you would look at the '3Bet Preflop' statistic. That method doesn't translate for 4Betting ranges since it is linked to 2Bet% and there is a separate statistic for that called '4Bet Ratio'.
Flag_Hippo
Moderator
 
Posts: 9531
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:50 am


Return to PokerTracker 4

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron
highfalutin