Hi, I've run into some problems trying to filter for (what I think are) fairly standard spots, because of the limitations of the filter system (I can be more specific or link previous posts if anyone cares to hear more). Moreover, in Notetracker, there's no way to create custom filters. With that in mind, I have a few suggestions for some options which imo could make things vastly easier and which probably wouldn't be too hard to implement.
- Under Actions and Opportunities -> Bet-Sizing, it would be very useful if, in addition to "% of pot" and "BB" type options, there was a "% of stack" option. That way you wouldn't have to rely on indirect sensors for determining (non-raise) "all-ins", such as post-flop actions or post-flop SPR, which can leave loopholes.
- It would be very useful to be able to filter the actions/stacks/sizings etc for more than just one opponent. I could envision this happening in the form of being able to add additional "Opponent Buttons" as needed (up to a reasonable limit) in Notetracker note editing. As it stands now, action sequencing (first action = " ", second action = " ", etc) can't really account for multiple opponent's actions, since it could just be two players doing a sequence of actions. And there already is one Opponent button, with its own filtering tables, which is nice, but not enough for many not-that-uncommon things. Seems a decent idea to be able to add more buttons, or add an option for users to add more during use, using a similar separate filter-table approach.
- Specific to Notetracker: Sorting things in proper/congruent order. I noticed using a "Donks flop with top-pair or better with {cardrange} on {board-flop}" auto-note that the {cardrange} and {board-flop} are not sorted in the same order. i.e.: one player's note said something like "Donks flop with top pair or better with {JT, KJ} on {Jxx, Txx}", where we see that the JT must necessarily refer to the T-high flop, and the KJ must then refer to the J-high flop. But the JT is listed first in its list, while its "match", the T-high flop, is listed second in its list. I was able to figure out the discrepancy with these two examples, but obviously with more and/or different examples it could be impossible to tell which hand belongs with which board if they're not in the same order in their respective lists.
- last and definitely least (but still would be nice, and pretty sure it's trivial to implement with no down-side): I mentioned this already during a support ticket, but an automatic word-wrap/margin limit for the tool-tip seen when hovering over Notes during play would eliminate some headache. I posted an example in a thread where if you don't use carriage returns while typing, the tool-tip actually gets large enough to shift off-screen and look very ugly. The problem being that, when you actually type the notes, the text-box itself DOES auto word wrap, so you instinctually don't think to use carriage returns as you type. You only realize you need them after-the-fact when a huge ugly yellow block appears across your entire screen in the middle of mutli-tabling.