Why is it that PT4 is still performing poorly in comparison to HEM1?
I have the same hand histories in a HEM1 DB and in a PT4 DB which are a little less than 110.000 hands. While filtering in HEM1 takes only seconds it feels like ages in PT4. Though I have to differ between Graph, overview data and tournament table. Graph is instantly reday while overview and tournaments take at least a minute to filter.
At first I thought it might be live scanning from ESET NOD 5 so I excluded postgres.exe, pg_ctl.exe and pokertracker.exe from scanning but it is still sloooooooow.
And don't tell me its my machine. Its a Core i7 with 7200 RPM HDD and 6 GB Ram.
I mean its only 110K hands. What are people doing with 1 Million oder 10 Million hands? Wait days when they wanna know how they did?